Evaluacija programa u zajednici

  • Obavijesti
  • Datoteke
  • Hrvatski
  • English
  • Rezultati ispita
OPĆI PODACI O KOLEGIJU
Naziv kolegijaEvaluacija programa u zajednici
Katedra radnopravnih i socijalnih znanosti i socijalnog rada
Broj ECTS bodova4
Nositelj kolegijaizv.prof.dr.sc. Hea Won Kim
Zgrada, kabinetRadićeva 13
Telefon
e-mailhkim@pravos.hr
Nositelj kolegijaizv.prof.dr.sc. Hea Won Kim
Zgrada, kabinetRadićeva 13
Telefon
e-mailhkim@pravos.hr
Suradnikdr.sc. Dinka Caha
Zgrada, kabinetRadićeva 13 S. Radića 17/I, soba 18-1
Telefon+385 31 224 550
e-maildinka.caha@pravos.hr
Suradnikdr.sc. Dinka Caha
Zgrada, kabinetRadićeva 13 S. Radića 17/I, soba 18-1
Telefon+385 31 224 550
e-maildinka.caha@pravos.hr
OPIS KOLEGIJA
Sadržaj kolegija

Ovaj kolegij podučava različite vrste evaluacije programa, uključujući procjenu potreba, evaluaciju procesa, evaluaciju učinaka i rezultata te analizu troškova. Kolegij sadrži dva dijela: 1) Studenti će razviti plan za evaluaciju programa, a koji sadrži adekvatan nact i odgovarajuća pitanja; 2) Koristeći podatke odabranih organizacija, studenti će naučiti kako ih analizirati te kako efikasno predstaviti rezultate u pisanom obliku uzimajući u obzir politički i međuljudski kontekst u kojem se vrši evaluacija. Pri tome će studenti uzimati perspektive evaluatora, financijera, programskog osoblja i dionika u planiranju, provedbi i reagiranju na evaluaciju programa.

Ishodi učenja kolegija

Primijeniti vještine kritičkog razmišljanja unutar konteksta evaluacije programa., Koristiti etičke istraživačke standarde i principe primjerene za evaluaciju programa unutar zajednice., Vrednovati istraživačke metode temeljem relevantnog znanja i vještina povezanih s dobi, kulturom, invaliditetom, etničkom pripadnošču, obiteljskom strukturom, bračnim statusom, državljanstvom, rasnom pripadnošću, spolnom, rodnom i seksualnom orijentacijom i bojom kože., Vrednovati istraživačke studije., Primjenjivati rezultate istraživanja u svrhu poboljšanja prakse u zajednici., Odrediti kriterije za primjeren dizajn evaluacijskog istraživanja., Odabrati prikladan dizajn evaluacijskog istraživanja i primijeniti ga na odgovarajući kontekst programa.,

NAČIN IZVOĐENJA NASTAVE
☑ Predavanja
☑ Seminari i radionice
☑ Vježbe
☑ Samostalni zadaci
☐ Multimedija i internet
☑ Obrazovanje na daljinu
☐ Konzultacije
☐ Laboratorij
☐ Terenska nastava
☐ Mentorski rad
☐ Provjera znanja
NAČIN POLAGANJA ISPITA
☐ Usmeni
☑ Pismeni
☐ Kolokvij
Ostalo: Projekt izrade plana evaluacije programa
Dodatne činjenice
Očekuje se da studenti prisustvuju i sudjeluju na svoj nastavi. Studenti trebaju pročitati zadane tekstove i napraviti zadaću te dolaziti na nastavu spremni za raspravu i pitanja. Zbog prirode ovog kolegija i grupnih zadataka, važno je i nužno da studenti redovito pohađaju nastavu. Pohađanje nastave i aktivno sudjelovanje u svim aktivnostima ključni su za postizanje ishoda učenja. Nastava se izvodi na hrvatskom i engleskom jeziku.
POPIS LITERATURE ZA STUDIJ I POLAGANJE ISPITA
Obvezna literatura
Bonde, A. H., Stjernqvist, N. W., Sabinsky, M. S. i Maindal, H. T.. Process evaluation of implementation fidelity in a Danish health-promoting school intervention. 2018. BMC Public Health, 18(1). https://doi- org.proxy.ulib.uits.iu.edu/10.1186/s12889-018-6289-5
Grinnell, Jr., R., Gabor, P. i Unrau, Y.. Program evaluation for social workers: Foundations of evidence-based programs (8th ed.). 2019. Oxford University Press
W. K. Kellogg Foundation. Logic model development guide. 2004. https://www.wkkf.org/resource-directory/resource/2006/02/wk-kellogg-foundation-logic-model-development-guide
Müller, E., Hahlweg, P. i Scholl, I.. What do stakeholders need to implement shared decision making in routine cancer care? A qualitative needs assessment. 2016. Acta Oncologica, 55(12). https://doi- org.proxy.ulib.uits.iu.edu/10.1080/0284186X.2016.1227087
Royse, D. i Badger, K.. Needs assessment planning: Starting where you are. 2015. Australian Social Work, 68(3). https://doi-org.proxy.ulib.uits.iu.edu/10.1080/0312407X.2015.1035661
Sorensen, J. L. i Llamas, J. D.. Process evaluation of a community outpatient program treating substance use disorders. 2018. disorders. Journal of Community Psychology, 46(7). https://doi-org.proxy.ulib.uits.iu.edu/10.1002/jcop.21976
Widman, L., Golin, C. E., Kamke, K., Burnette, J. L. i Prinstein, M. J. . Sexual Assertiveness Skills and Sexual Decision-Making in Adolescent Girls: Randomized Controlled Trial of an Online Program. 2018. Program. American Journal of Public Health, 108(1). https://doi-org.proxy.ulib.uits.iu.edu/10.2105/AJPH.2017.304106
. U slučaju pronalaska relavantnijih članaka, isti će biti dodani popisu literature. 2022.
Izborna literatura
Alkin, M. C.. Evaluation essentials: from A to Z. 2010. Guilford Press
Dahlberg, L. i McCaig, C.. Practical research and evaluation: a start-to-finish guide for practitioners. 2010. SAGE
Mertens, D. i Wilson, A.. Program evaluation theory and practice: A comprehensive guide. 2012. Guilford Press
Royse, D., Thyer, B. A., Padgett, D. i Logan, T. K.. Program evaluation: An introduction (6th ed.). 2015. Brooks/Cole
Weinbach, R. i Grinnell, R.. Statistics for social workers (9th ed.). 2013. Allyn & Bacon
GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE COURSE
Course titleProgram Evaluation in Community
Chair of Labour and Social Security Law Sciences and Social Work
Number of ECTS credits4
Lecturerizv.prof.dr.sc. Hea Won Kim
Office AddressRadićeva 13
Telephone
e-mailhkim@pravos.hr
Lecturerizv.prof.dr.sc. Hea Won Kim
Office AddressRadićeva 13
Telephone
e-mailhkim@pravos.hr
Associatedr.sc. Dinka Caha
Office AddressRadićeva 13 S. Radića 17/I, soba 18-1
Telephone+385 31 224 550
e-maildinka.caha@pravos.hr
Associatedr.sc. Dinka Caha
Office AddressRadićeva 13 S. Radića 17/I, soba 18-1
Telephone+385 31 224 550
e-maildinka.caha@pravos.hr
COURSE DESCRIPTION
Course content

This course examines different types of program evaluation, including needs assessment, process evaluation, impact and outcome evaluation, and cost analysis. The course has two major parts: 1) Students will develop a program evaluation plan that identifies appropriate program evaluation questions, develops designs suitable for addressing the program evaluation questions, 2) Utilizing the existing community agency’s data, students will learn how to accurately analyze the data, and effectively present the findings in written form, while being sensitive to the political and interpersonal contexts in which the evaluation takes place. In addition, students will explore the role of evaluators, funders, program staff, and stakeholders in planning, implementing, and responding to program evaluation.

Course learning outcomes

Apply critical thinking skills within the context of program evaluation., Use ethical research standards and principles appropriate to program evaluation in the community., Evaluate research methods based on relevant knowledge and skills associated with age, class, color, culture, disability, ethnicity, family structure, gender, marital status, national origin, race, religion, sex and sexual orientation., Evaluate research studies relevant to the student’s practicum setting., Apply research findings to enhance community-based practice., Define the criteria for appropriate use of research designs for program evaluation research., Select from a variety of evaluation research designs and apply them to the appropriate program context.,

TEACHING METHODS
☑ Lectures
☑ Seminars and workshops
☑ Exercises
☑ Independent tasks
☐ Multimedia and internet
☑ Distance education
☐ Office hours
☐ Laboratory
☐ Field work
☐ Mentoring work
☐ Knowledge test
EXAMINATION PROCEDURE
☐ Oral exam
☑ Written exam
☐ Colloquium
Other: Projekt izrade plana evaluacije programa
ADDITIONAL FACTS
Both part- and full-time students are expected to attend and participate in all class sessions. Students should complete readings and homework as assigned and come to class prepared for discussion and questions. Because of the nature of this course, service-learning group assignments, regular attendance is required and extremely important. Class attendance and active participation during the service-learning program is mandatory. English language, Croatian language
LIST OF LITERATURE FOR STUDIES AND EXAMS
Required reading
Bonde, A. H., Stjernqvist, N. W., Sabinsky, M. S. i Maindal, H. T.. Process evaluation of implementation fidelity in a Danish health-promoting school intervention. 2018. BMC Public Health, 18(1). https://doi- org.proxy.ulib.uits.iu.edu/10.1186/s12889-018-6289-5
Grinnell, Jr., R., Gabor, P. i Unrau, Y.. Program evaluation for social workers: Foundations of evidence-based programs (8th ed.). 2019. Oxford University Press
W. K. Kellogg Foundation. Logic model development guide. 2004. https://www.wkkf.org/resource-directory/resource/2006/02/wk-kellogg-foundation-logic-model-development-guide
Müller, E., Hahlweg, P. i Scholl, I.. What do stakeholders need to implement shared decision making in routine cancer care? A qualitative needs assessment. 2016. Acta Oncologica, 55(12). https://doi- org.proxy.ulib.uits.iu.edu/10.1080/0284186X.2016.1227087
Royse, D. i Badger, K.. Needs assessment planning: Starting where you are. 2015. Australian Social Work, 68(3). https://doi-org.proxy.ulib.uits.iu.edu/10.1080/0312407X.2015.1035661
Sorensen, J. L. i Llamas, J. D.. Process evaluation of a community outpatient program treating substance use disorders. 2018. disorders. Journal of Community Psychology, 46(7). https://doi-org.proxy.ulib.uits.iu.edu/10.1002/jcop.21976
Widman, L., Golin, C. E., Kamke, K., Burnette, J. L. i Prinstein, M. J. . Sexual Assertiveness Skills and Sexual Decision-Making in Adolescent Girls: Randomized Controlled Trial of an Online Program. 2018. Program. American Journal of Public Health, 108(1). https://doi-org.proxy.ulib.uits.iu.edu/10.2105/AJPH.2017.304106
. U slučaju pronalaska relavantnijih članaka, isti će biti dodani popisu literature. 2022.
Optional reading
Alkin, M. C.. Evaluation essentials: from A to Z. 2010. Guilford Press
Dahlberg, L. i McCaig, C.. Practical research and evaluation: a start-to-finish guide for practitioners. 2010. SAGE
Mertens, D. i Wilson, A.. Program evaluation theory and practice: A comprehensive guide. 2012. Guilford Press
Royse, D., Thyer, B. A., Padgett, D. i Logan, T. K.. Program evaluation: An introduction (6th ed.). 2015. Brooks/Cole
Weinbach, R. i Grinnell, R.. Statistics for social workers (9th ed.). 2013. Allyn & Bacon