Ciljevi predmeta • Upoznavanje studenta sa osnovnim pojmovima i konceptima prava EU (izvori prava EU, načela EU prava, postupci pred Europskim sudom i sudsku praksu vezanu uz unutarnje tržište); • Stjecanje znanja o osnovnim pojmovima vezanim za Europski sud, postupke pred Europskim sudom i sudsku praksu vezanu uz unutarnje tržište; • Razvijanje osnovnih vještina kritiče analize i osposobljavanje studenata za case study tehniku rješavanja problema uz pomoć slučajeva iz prakse Europskog suda Sadržaj 1. Europski sud pravde Kako seminarska nastava prati nastavu iz predmeta Europsko javno pravo. Studenti na seminaru proširuju znanje o Europskom sudu kao instituciji i postupcima pred Europskim sudu u cilju boljeg razumijevanja prakse Suda. 2. Načelo nadređenosti i načelo izravnog učinka • Predmet 26/62, Van Gend en Loos, [1963] ECR; Predmet 6/64 Costa v. ENEL [1964] ECR 585; • Predmet 106/77 Simmenthal II [1978] ECR 629 3. Učinci uredbi • Predmet 34/73 Fratelli Variola S.p.A. v Amministrazone italiana delle Finanze [1973] ECR 981; • Predmet 93/71Orsolina Leonesio v Ministero dell'agricoltura e foreste [1972] ECR287 ; • Predmet 39/72 Commission v Italy [1973] ECR 101 4. Učinci direktiva • Vertikalni izravni učinak; Predmet 41/74 Yvonne van Duyn v Home Office [1974]ECR 1337; Predmet 148/78 Criminal proceedings against TullioRatti, 1979 [ECR] 1629; Predmet 8/81 Ursula Becker v Finanzamt Münster Innenstadt, 1982 [ECR] 53; Predmet 152/84 Marshall [1986] ECR 723 • Horizontalni izravni učinak; Predmet C991/92 Paola Faccini Dori v. Recreb Srl. [1994] ECR I93325; Mišljenje g. nezavisnog odvjetnika Lenza od 9. veljače 1994. u predmetu C991/92 Paola Faccini Dori v Recreb Srl [1994] ECR I903325; Predmet C-144/04 Werner Mangold v. Rudiger Helm; Predmet C-555/07 Seda Kucukdeveci v. Swedex GmbH& Co. KG 5. Odgovornost države za štetu zbog povrede prava Unije • Spojeni predmeti C96/90 i C99/90 Andrea Francovich and Danila Bonifaci and others v Italian Republic [1991] ECR • I95357; Spojeni predmeti C946/93 i C948/93 Brasserie du Pêcheur SA v Bundesrepublik Deutschland and The Queen v • Secretary of State for Transport, ex parte: Factortame Ltd and others. [1996] ECR I 91029 6. Uspostava zajedničkog tržišta • Povijesni prikaz procesa uspostave zajedničkog tržišta kroz prikaz svih faza ekonomske integracije u EU. • Sloboda kretanja roba • Predmet Roi v Benoît and Gustave Dassonville [1974] ECR 837 • Predmet 120/78 Rewe-Zentral AG v Bundesmonopolverwaltung für Branntwein (Cassis de Dijon) [1979] ECR 649 • Spojeni predmeti C9267/91 i C9268/91 Criminal proceedings againstBernard Keck and Daniel Mithouard [1993] ECR I96097 8. Sloboda pružanja usluga • Predmet C955/94 Reinhard Gebhard v Consiglio dell'Ordine degli Avvocati e Procuratori di Milano [1995] ECR I94165 9. Zaštita temeljnih sloboda i odnosa sa tržišnim slobodama • Predmet C9159/90 Društvo za zaštitu nerođene djece(SPUC) v. Stephen Grogan i ostali [1991] ECR I94685; • Predmet C9112/00 Eugen Schmidberger, Internationale Transporte und Planzüge v. Republik Ősterreich [2003] ECR I95659; • Predmet C936/02 Omega [2004] ECR I99609

Objasniti osnovne pojmove vezane uz Europski sud i postupke pred Europskim sudom , Definirati i razlikovati postupke pred Europskim sudom i sudsku praksu vezanu uz unutarnje tržište, Izraditi seminarski rad, Primijeniti pravna pravila EU pri rješavanju pravnih problema , Kritički analizirati sudsku praksu Suda EU ,

Objectives of the course • Familiarizing the student with the basic terms and concepts of EU law (sources of EU law, principles of EU law, procedures before the Court of Justice of the European Unionand judicial practice related to the internal market); • Acquiring knowledge about basic terms related to the Court of Justice of the European Union, procedures before the Court of Justice of the European Unionand judicial practice related to the internal market; • Developing basic skills of critical analysis and training students for case study technique of problem solving with the help of cases from the practice of the Court of Justice of the European Union Content 1. Court of Justice of the European Union As the seminar teaching follows the teaching of the subject European Public Law. At the seminar, students expand their knowledge about the European Court as an institution and procedures before the European Court in order to better understand the practice of the Court. 2. The principle of superiority and the principle of direct effect • Case 26/62, Van Gend en Loos, [1963] ECR; Case 6/64 Costa v. ENEL [1964] ECR 585; • Case 106/77 Simmenthal II [1978] ECR 629 3. Effects of regulations • Case 34/73 Fratelli Variola S.p.A. v Amministrazone italiana delle Finanze [1973] ECR 981; • Case 93/71 Orsolina Leonesio v Ministero dell'agricoltura e foreste [1972] ECR287; • Case 39/72 Commission v Italy [1973] ECR 101 4. Effects of directives • Vertical direct effect; Case 41/74 Yvonne van Duyn v Home Office [1974]ECR 1337; Case 148/78 Criminal proceedings against TullioRatti, 1979 [ECR] 1629; Case 8/81 Ursula Becker v Finanzamt Münster Innenstadt, 1982 [ECR] 53; Case 152/84 Marshall [1986] ECR 723 • Horizontal direct effect; Case C991/92 Paola Faccini Dori v. Recreb Srl. [1994] ECR I93325; Opinion of Independent Advocate Lenzo of 9 February 1994 in Case C991/92 Paola Faccini Dori v Recreb Srl [1994] ECR I903325; Case C-144/04 Werner Mangold v. Rudiger Helm; Case C-555/07 Seda Kucukdeveci v. Swedex GmbH& Co. KG 5. Liability of the state for damage due to violation of Union law • Joined cases C96/90 and C99/90 Andrea Francovich and Danila Bonifaci and others v Italian Republic [1991] ECR • I95357; Joined cases C946/93 and C948/93 Brasserie du Pêcheur SA v Bundesrepublik Deutschland and The Queen v • Secretary of State for Transport, ex parte: Factortame Ltd and others. [1996] ECR I 91029 6. Establishment of a common market • Historical presentation of the process of establishment of the common market through presentation of all phases of economic integration in the EU. • Freedom of movement of goods • Case Roi v Benoît and Gustave Dassonville [1974] ECR 837 • Case 120/78 Rewe-Zentral AG v Bundesmonopolverwaltung für Branntwein (Cassis de Dijon) [1979] ECR 649 • Joined cases C9267/91 and C9268/91 Criminal proceedings against Bernard Keck and Daniel Mithouard [1993] ECR I96097 8. Freedom to provide services • Case C955/94 Reinhard Gebhard v Consiglio dell'Ordine degli Avvocati e Procuratori di Milano [1995] ECR I94165 9. Protection of fundamental freedoms and relations with market freedoms • Case C9159/90 Society for the Protection of Unborn Children (SPUC) v Stephen Grogan and Others [1991] ECR I94685; • Case C9112/00 Eugen Schmidberger, Internationale Transporte und Planzüge v. Republik Ősterreich [2003] ECR I95659; • Case C936/02 Omega [2004] ECR I99609

Explain the basic terms related to the Court of Justice of the European Union and procedures before the Court of Justice of the European Union, Define and differentiate the proceedings before the Court of Justice of the European Union and the case law related to the internal market, Write a seminar paper, Apply EU legal rules when solving legal problems, Critically analyze the jurisprudence of the Court of Justice of the European Union,